#13 of 25 Things we know about what we don't know about Marketing Effectiveness
Thursday July 17th 2008
Marketing, Advertising & Media Tests work. Don't let anyone persuade you otherwise
In an earlier note in this series of "25 Things.." we observed (#4 on July 4th refers) that "testing" had become a dirty word in marketing circles. There is no possible justification for this phobia, other than from the marketing destructor who resents the prospect of finding out and who rejects determining what works and what doesn't.
The facts are straightforward. The recipe for making an inconclusive marketing test - that's the worst possible result from any investigation - is easy to handle. What often passes as an "experiment" is in truth regularly no more than a post hoc review of what happened. Our experience is that this is a lousy recipe and doomed to fail. If the variables remain uncontrolled and the marketer takes the data "as it falls", this approach rarely delivers conclusive results.
There is an attitudinal bug bear to overcome. There are marketers who prefer inconclusive results rather than definitive proof that certain aspects of the marketing activity failed to deliver the goals.
Building in testing and investigation as an integral campaign execution methodology, usually delivers conclusive results - but yes folks, some of those with be "unacceptable"
But surely we all need to adopt the continual improvement agenda. As it was put to me years ago and is still relevant today - "If we don't "fail" or "get it wrong" from time to time, then we're not trying hard enough".
If you build "investigation" as an integral part of the campaign, and create variables of input you can be almost guaranteed to get conclusive results. Internet communication now makes continual testing & investigation the new marketing effectiveness norm.
Marketing, Advertising & Media Tests work. If your agency, consultants etc. tell you otherwise and encourage you to adopt a different approach, I suggest you get some new marketing effectiveness suppliers
Marketing, Advertising & Media Tests work. Don't let anyone persuade you otherwise
In an earlier note in this series of "25 Things.." we observed (#4 on July 4th refers) that "testing" had become a dirty word in marketing circles. There is no possible justification for this phobia, other than from the marketing destructor who resents the prospect of finding out and who rejects determining what works and what doesn't.
The facts are straightforward. The recipe for making an inconclusive marketing test - that's the worst possible result from any investigation - is easy to handle. What often passes as an "experiment" is in truth regularly no more than a post hoc review of what happened. Our experience is that this is a lousy recipe and doomed to fail. If the variables remain uncontrolled and the marketer takes the data "as it falls", this approach rarely delivers conclusive results.
There is an attitudinal bug bear to overcome. There are marketers who prefer inconclusive results rather than definitive proof that certain aspects of the marketing activity failed to deliver the goals.
Building in testing and investigation as an integral campaign execution methodology, usually delivers conclusive results - but yes folks, some of those with be "unacceptable"
But surely we all need to adopt the continual improvement agenda. As it was put to me years ago and is still relevant today - "If we don't "fail" or "get it wrong" from time to time, then we're not trying hard enough".
If you build "investigation" as an integral part of the campaign, and create variables of input you can be almost guaranteed to get conclusive results. Internet communication now makes continual testing & investigation the new marketing effectiveness norm.
Marketing, Advertising & Media Tests work. If your agency, consultants etc. tell you otherwise and encourage you to adopt a different approach, I suggest you get some new marketing effectiveness suppliers
Amazing site! I found your site very interesting.Thanks!There is competition in almost all industries and sectors due to the increased number of competitors. When such is the case, tools like advertising and branding comes in helpful to distinguish the business organization. The competition is so stiff these days that competitors acquire the product know how quite early in the product life cycle.
Reply to this